TOPIC INTELLIGENCE

Human Oversight

Follow verified regulatory records and source-backed editorial coverage concerning human oversight.

Coverage scope

  • Verified regulatory records
  • Source-backed editorial coverage
  • Relevant jurisdictions and primary materials

CURRENT COVERAGE

5 records · 2 articles

Relevant jurisdictions: California, Colorado, New York, Vermont, Washington.

REGULATORY RECORDS

Signed — effective January 1, 2027statute

Colorado Automated Decision-Making Technology Act

Colorado repealed and reenacted its automated-decision framework. Beginning January 1, 2027, the law governs covered automated decision-making technology used to materially influence consequential decisions, including employment decisions.

Automated Employment DecisionsHuman OversightNotice & ConsentBias / DiscriminationRecordkeeping
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Vetoedbill

California SB 7 — Employment: Automated Decision Systems

SB 7 proposed notice, access, correction, appeal, and human-oversight requirements for employer use of automated decision systems. The Governor vetoed the bill on October 13, 2025; it did not become law.

Automated Employment DecisionsEmployee MonitoringHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
In Senate Labor Committeebill

New York Boundaries on Technology Act

The BOT Act proposes impact assessments, notice, restrictions on electronic monitoring and automated employment decision tools, data-access rights, and meaningful human oversight. The official Senate record currently lists S 10147 as active in the Senate Labor Committee.

AI HiringEmployee MonitoringAutomated Employment DecisionsHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Referred to House committeebill

Vermont H.340 — Automated Decision Systems

H.340 proposes a broad framework for developers and deployers of automated decision systems used for consequential decisions, including employment decisions. The official status page lists the bill in the House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development and shows no enacted act.

Automated Employment DecisionsAI HiringBias / DiscriminationNotice & ConsentHuman Oversight
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Retained in House Appropriationsbill

Washington HB 1672 — Technology Used by Employers in the Workplace

HB 1672 proposes restrictions and procedural protections for employer electronic monitoring and automated decision systems. After a substitute received a do-pass recommendation, the bill was referred to House Appropriations and retained in that status for the 2026 session.

Employee MonitoringAutomated Employment DecisionsWorkplace PrivacyHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance

LATEST COVERAGE