TOPIC INTELLIGENCE

Workplace Privacy

Follow workplace data collection, biometric systems, privacy safeguards and technology-related consent requirements.

Coverage scope

  • Workplace data collection and use
  • Biometric and sensitive data
  • Notice and consent
  • Data governance and safeguards

CURRENT COVERAGE

8 records · 4 articles

Relevant jurisdictions: California, Texas, Maryland, Washington, Connecticut.

REGULATORY RECORDS

Effective — ADMT duties begin January 1, 2027regulation

CCPA Risk Assessment and Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulations

Final CCPA regulations establish risk-assessment requirements for specified high-risk processing beginning in 2026 and notice, access, opt-out, and appeal provisions for covered ADMT used in significant decisions beginning January 1, 2027.

Related coverage: California Enacts New Workplace AI Rules: What SB 947 and AB 1883 Require →
Enacted — effective January 1, 2027statute

California AB 1883 — Workplace Surveillance Tools

AB 1883 (Chapter 853) prohibits employer use of AI workplace surveillance tools on employees for emotional-state recognition, inference or prediction, or neural-data collection. Signed September 30, 2026, it takes effect January 1, 2027. The effect of its safety language remains unresolved.

Related coverage: California Enacts New Workplace AI Rules: What SB 947 and AB 1883 Require →
Retained in House Appropriationsbill

Washington HB 1672 — Technology Used by Employers in the Workplace

HB 1672 proposes restrictions and procedural protections for employer electronic monitoring and automated decision systems. After a substitute received a do-pass recommendation, the bill was referred to House Appropriations and retained in that status for the 2026 session.

Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance →
Current nonbinding guidanceagency guidance

Connecticut Attorney General Guidance on Existing Laws and Artificial Intelligence

The Connecticut Attorney General's February 2026 memorandum explains that existing civil-rights, privacy, consumer-protection, data-security, and antitrust laws may apply to AI, including AI used in hiring and employment.

Related coverage: Connecticut’s AI Employment Law Is Now Partly in Effect: What Employers Need to Know →
Effectivestatute

Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act

HB 149 establishes a broad statewide AI governance framework. Its employment relevance is limited but real: the chapter-wide intentional-discrimination prohibition is written to apply to a person developing or deploying AI, while consumer-specific disclosures do not cover individuals acting in an employment context.

Effectivestatute

Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Law

Texas law requires advance notice and consent before a person captures an individual's biometric identifier for a commercial purpose and regulates disclosure, protection, and destruction of identifiers. HB 149 amended the provision for AI training and public-source media.

Workplace PrivacyNotice & Consent

LATEST COVERAGE