TOPIC INTELLIGENCE

Employee Monitoring

Follow policy questions around workplace surveillance, productivity analytics, biometrics and employee privacy.

Coverage scope

  • Monitoring and notice requirements
  • Biometric and location data
  • Productivity and attention analytics
  • Data retention and access

CURRENT COVERAGE

5 records · 2 articles

Relevant jurisdictions: California, New York, Washington.

REGULATORY RECORDS

Vetoedbill

California SB 7 — Employment: Automated Decision Systems

SB 7 proposed notice, access, correction, appeal, and human-oversight requirements for employer use of automated decision systems. The Governor vetoed the bill on October 13, 2025; it did not become law.

Related coverage: California AI Hiring Compliance in 2026: How FEHA and CCPA Automated Decision Rules Fit Together →
In Senate Labor Committeebill

New York Boundaries on Technology Act

The BOT Act proposes impact assessments, notice, restrictions on electronic monitoring and automated employment decision tools, data-access rights, and meaningful human oversight. The official Senate record currently lists S 10147 as active in the Senate Labor Committee.

Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance →
Retained in House Appropriationsbill

Washington HB 1672 — Technology Used by Employers in the Workplace

HB 1672 proposes restrictions and procedural protections for employer electronic monitoring and automated decision systems. After a substitute received a do-pass recommendation, the bill was referred to House Appropriations and retained in that status for the 2026 session.

Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance →

LATEST COVERAGE