SUMMARY
SB 947 limits employer reliance on automated decision systems in employee discipline and termination and adds human-corroboration, postuse-notice, and employee-data-description requirements when reliance is primary.
WHY IT MATTERS
The law distinguishes prohibited sole reliance from primary reliance that triggers specific procedural safeguards. It does not create a blanket prohibition on automated employment decisions.
KEY REQUIREMENTS
- Do not rely solely on an automated decision system when making a disciplinary or termination decision.
- When primarily relying on ADS output for discipline or termination, direct a human to corroborate the decision using data collected or used to produce the output or other relevant corroborating or supporting information.
- Do not use an output that cannot be corroborated or that the reviewer finds inaccurate, incomplete, or misleading.
- Provide the affected employee a stand-alone postuse notice when primarily relying on ADS output and, on request, a meaningful objective description of the employee's own data used by the ADS.
COVERAGE
Employers: Private and public employers within the statute's definition, including specified governmental entities and labor contractors.
Workers: Employees; the enrolled operative provisions do not create the same decision-specific process for applicants or independent contractors.
Exceptions: Qualifying collective bargaining agreements may expressly waive the part when all statutory conditions are met.
Exceptions: A narrow federal-compliance exception applies to specified aircraft, national-security, military, space, and defense operations.
ENFORCEMENT & PENALTIES
California Labor Commissioner may enforce through investigation, temporary relief, citation, or civil action; public prosecutors may also enforce. In specified proceedings, demonstrated ADS use shifts the burden to the employer to show no primary reliance or compliance. The enacted text omits the introduced draft’s express standalone worker damages action.
A civil penalty of $500 per violation, along with the statute's specified injunctive, damages, fee, and cost provisions.
CHANGE HISTORY
- verification update
Record re-verified
Official source links, status, and key dates were checked for this maintenance release.
- signed
Governor signed SB 947
Governor Newsom signed the employment automated-decision-systems measure; the statute expressly becomes operative July 1, 2027.
- passed legislature
SB 947 presented to the Governor
The enrolled measure was presented after final legislative passage.
TOPICS
PRIMARY SOURCES
RELATED DEVELOPMENTS
Employment Regulations Regarding Automated-Decision Systems
California regulations clarify how the Fair Employment and Housing Act applies when employers and other covered entities use automated-decision systems in employment decisions.
Related coverage: California Enacts New Workplace AI Rules: What SB 947 and AB 1883 Require →CCPA Risk Assessment and Automated Decisionmaking Technology Regulations
Final CCPA regulations establish risk-assessment requirements for specified high-risk processing beginning in 2026 and notice, access, opt-out, and appeal provisions for covered ADMT used in significant decisions beginning January 1, 2027.
Related coverage: California Enacts New Workplace AI Rules: What SB 947 and AB 1883 Require →Information, not legal advice. Bot Labor Law provides general informational content that may not reflect the most current legal developments. Consult qualified counsel regarding specific legal matters.