TOPIC INTELLIGENCE

Automated Discipline

Follow verified regulatory records and source-backed editorial coverage concerning automated discipline.

Coverage scope

  • Verified regulatory records
  • Source-backed editorial coverage
  • Relevant jurisdictions and primary materials

CURRENT COVERAGE

6 records · 1 articles

Relevant jurisdictions: Illinois, New Jersey.

REGULATORY RECORDS

Effectivestatute

Illinois Human Rights Act — Use of Artificial Intelligence in Employment

Illinois amended its Human Rights Act to address employer use of artificial intelligence across recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, and other employment terms.

AI HiringAutomated Employment DecisionsAutomated DisciplineAutomated TerminationBias / DiscriminationNotice & Consent
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Vetoedbill

California SB 7 — Employment: Automated Decision Systems

SB 7 proposed notice, access, correction, appeal, and human-oversight requirements for employer use of automated decision systems. The Governor vetoed the bill on October 13, 2025; it did not become law.

Automated Employment DecisionsEmployee MonitoringHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Effectivestatute

New York Public-Sector Automated Employment Decision-Making Framework

New York requires state agencies using covered automated employment decision-making tools to publish specified information. A 2026 chapter amendment added a disclosure provision for defined local public entities and extended related protections for public employees.

Automated Employment DecisionsNotice & ConsentRecordkeepingAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
In Senate Labor Committeebill

New York Boundaries on Technology Act

The BOT Act proposes impact assessments, notice, restrictions on electronic monitoring and automated employment decision tools, data-access rights, and meaningful human oversight. The official Senate record currently lists S 10147 as active in the Senate Labor Committee.

AI HiringEmployee MonitoringAutomated Employment DecisionsHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Current agency guidanceagency guidance

New Jersey Guidance on Algorithmic Discrimination

New Jersey's Division on Civil Rights explains that the Law Against Discrimination applies when automated decision systems or other algorithmic tools cause unlawful discrimination, including in employment advertising, screening, hiring, evaluation, promotion, discipline, and termination.

AI HiringAutomated Employment DecisionsBias / DiscriminationAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance
Retained in House Appropriationsbill

Washington HB 1672 — Technology Used by Employers in the Workplace

HB 1672 proposes restrictions and procedural protections for employer electronic monitoring and automated decision systems. After a substitute received a do-pass recommendation, the bill was referred to House Appropriations and retained in that status for the 2026 session.

Employee MonitoringAutomated Employment DecisionsWorkplace PrivacyHuman OversightAutomated DisciplineAutomated Termination
Related coverage: State AI Employment Laws: What’s Law, What’s Pending, and What’s Guidance

LATEST COVERAGE